Filed under: true stories , mischief
• 10:33 0
A Message from Congressman Todd Akin
Dear Missouri Friend:
What is your share of the national debt? Would you believe that Congress just raised it’s own credit limit again – and your share of the bill will be $46,319 by the time they are done spending?
On Thursday, I voted against increasing Congress’s debt limit (the amount that Congress can spend our country into debt) and I introduced legislation to make it more difficult for Congress to keep raising its debt limit. I blogged about how it is necessary to force Congress to take responsibility for out-of-control spending: “Congress needs every possible incentive to get its fiscal house in order. My resolution requires that a debt limit increase be voted on separately – not hidden in another bill. And, with a super-majority requirement, raising the debt will not be quite so simple.”
On Wednesday, I went down to the House floor to discuss the President’s new budget. In case you missed it, my staff has put together parts of that discussion on YouTube for you to watch. While we are still not finished reviewing the new budget, the big picture is clear. This budget will raise the deficit to a record level: $1.6 trillion and 10.6% of our nation’s gross domestic product. It will double the national debt in five years. By 2020, the interest on our debt will reach $840 billion. In addition, this budget raises taxes by $2 trillion. Even as our current entitlement spending is ballooning out of control, the White House has added brand new entitlements to this budget, including $1 trillion for government run healthcare.
As always, I’d love to hear your thoughts on the President’s budget, the debt limit increase or any other subject.
Sincerely,
W. Todd Akin
P.S. The 2010 Congressional Art Competition for high schoolers is coming up soon. If you know a talented student who lives in the 2nd District, invite them to complete a student entry form on my website and submit their work for this exciting event.
Filed under: Todd Akin, other , Todd Akin, US Congress
• 17:01 0
Obama Should Articulate Financial Industry Reform
This year James Kwak emerged as a prominent voice in the booming economics blogosphere as Simon Johnson’s counterpart at the exceptional Baseline Scenario blog. This morning Kwak posted re Barack Obama:
To me, the real question is whether he simply couldn’t get more done because of Congress, and it was actually a wise strategy for him to sit in the background and let Pelosi, Reid, and Baucus (and Lieberman??!!) take the lead, or whether he could have gotten more done by pushing harder and more publicly. I have no basis to know what the right legislative strategy is for health care, which is an intensely divisive issue where more Obama might have backfired. When it comes to financial reform, however, I think he clearly has not done enough. The public overwhelmingly wants reform; they just don’t know what reform should look like, and Obama and his team haven’t done a good job of showing them what it should be. As a result, they have not capitalized on the strong anti-Wall Street sentiment, and the result has been a classic interest-group battle on Capitol Hill.
I wholeheartedly agree with Kwak here. The public needs to know what meaningful financial industry reform should look like before the issue — which is Too Big to Ignore — is ignored.
Filed under: economics, politics, punditry , Baseline Scenario, James Kwak, Obama
• 12:26 0
Quick Apology to Readers
Since deciding on The New Ruffian as title for this blog, it’s annoyed me like whoa that it’s not yet posted at newruffian.com. This is because I have no bank account for paying the ‘Custom Domain’ charge online, and WordPress didn’t reply to my tweet about paying for it with snail-mail cash or a money order. So please accept my apology for the bizarre discrepancy between this blog’s title & domain. It looks sloppy, I know, and will soon be fixed.
Filed under: other , maintenance
• 11:47 0
Obama as Tenant

The St. Petersburg Times runs a site called Politifact that was first brought to my attention while working as New Media Director of a Chicago technology firm in 2008. At the time, I was auditing political websites for elements to use in one of the firm’s several online spamming abominations. There was very little about Politifact that caught my eye. The site seemed pretty straight-forward, and thereby useless to us, as we sought magical traffic widgets and functionality and the like. In short, my job was to find substantial traffic support to unsubstantial content.
Soon, my position at the firm was eliminated in the global financial hemorrhages of late-2008; then, Obama won the White House, the Democrats increased their majority in our Congress, and Politifact has emerged as one of the most important sites I regularly visit; and I regularly visit it for tidbits like this one –
To give the economic stimulus plan some perspective, “if you started the day Jesus Christ was born and spent $1 million every day since then, you still wouldn’t have spent $1 trillion.” (Mitch McConnell, Feb. 1, in appearance on CBS’ Face the Nation)
Senate Minority Leader McConnell, R-Ky., sought to put the proposed economic stimulus bill into some sobering perspective. We saved you from counting zeros on your online calculator by doing a quick and dirty assessment of whether the analogy is right.
We went with the commonly accepted theory that Jesus was born around 4 B.C. So we’ve come 2012 years since the birth of Christ. Now, 2,012 times 365 (yes, we are aware there are leap years … don’t be like that) times $1,000,000 is $734 billion, give or take a few hundred million.
The final stimulus bill checked in at $787 billion. So not only was McConnell right that $1 trillion is more than spending $1 million a day since Jesus was born, but the stimulus bill itself was also more than $1 million a day since Jesus was born.
Tonight I type from 2009’s finish line and the question that hangs heaviest in my mind about 2010 is whether or not such massive spending will serve anyone but that thin upper-slice of Americans that rode a windfall winning streak through the last decade. In his inaugural address, Obama referenced much of the last decade as a period of “greed and irresponsibility” and cited as culprit “our collective failure to make hard choices.” One ”hard choice” that Americans must make as we proceed to the International Year of Biodiversity is to reexamine our relationship with our government.
On Sunday, I took a friend visiting from Duke to the Capitol to observe the hard edge made by the bright white dome and the night’s cold dark. As we approached the the building he grew increasingly nervous, finally asking me, “Are you sure we’re allowed to be here?” Immediately I recalled (as I so often do) A Seriously Funny Man from Missouri on the cover of 3 July 2008’s TIME Magazine –
In the 1880s the british poet and culture critic Matthew Arnold paid two visits to the U.S. to observe the native customs. Eventually he set down his impressions in a book, Civilization in the United States. On the whole, he didn’t think there was much. For one thing, he was troubled by the way Americans appeared to lack any capacity for reverence toward superior men. “If there be a discipline in which the Americans are wanting,” he pronounced, “it is the discipline of awe and respect.” And in that connection, one institution of American life struck him as an especially bad idea. That was what he called “the addiction to ‘the funny man,’ who is a national misfortune there.”
Arnold didn’t mention any funnyman in particular. He didn’t have to. In an essay six years earlier, he had already attacked by name the most famous American funnyman of all, Mark Twain. His humor, Arnold sniffed, was “so attractive to the Philistine.” It would be truer to say it was attractive to anyone who valued plain speaking and the kind of deadly wit that could cut through the cant and hypocrisy surrounding any topic, no matter how sensitive: war, sex, religion, even race. Twain was righteous without being pious, angry for all the right reasons and funny in all the right ways. You might say he gave virtue a good name.
All the same, Twain was stung by Arnold’s words and prepared a reply that he never published. That’s a shame, because it includes the single best one-line defense not just of himself but also of how a democratic society works in the first place. “A discriminating irreverence,” he wrote, “is the creator and protector of human liberty.”
Regrettably, the “discipline of awe and respect” is alive and strong in our American political scene today; particularly among Democrats; particularly on Capitol Hill, where journalists and correspondents jockey for luncheons and call backs; where activists are herded from seminars to brown bag lunches to rallies and back to then to the bar and then home. All the while, no one seems to notice that lawmakers are your employees. So are the staffers they hire and the custodians who clean our congressional offices and the rooftop snipers whom I sincerely hope were ready & willing to brain my Blue Devil friend and me where we stood, if necessary, to protect our U.S. Capitol.
Barack Obama is my employee, too. He is also my tenant. To me, his Election ‘08 was a job interview and the candidates, applicants. We the People were a hiring board and once we’d hired our representatives, my hope was that they would … well, represent.
Unsurprisingly, they haven’t. Our Congress remains a brothel where our future is whored out to the highest bidder. And suddenly I feel like a sucker, having worked for Obama in ‘08 and believed in Obama in ‘09.
So what’s it going to be then, eh? in 2010. This year’s trajectory suggests that “conservatives” will remain united against Obama, “liberals” will continue to shift conservatively, and “progressives” will continue to get their asses kicked all over the gym, as they always have — at least, in my lifetime. That is, unless Americans — particularly We the Correspondents — employ Mark Twain’s “discriminating irreverence” toward the faux-majesty of government that somehow lifts citizens elected to national office beyond the reach of their employers: We the People.
NOTE: These are my initial thoughts on a philosophical shift I’ve advocated in American politics for some time. I post them here, now, without much of a proofread as it very early in the morning and I’m aching to write on something else. I may more-thoroughly edit this post later for publishing on FireDogLake. Then again, I may not.
Filed under: politics, punditry , Mark Twain, Mitch McConnell, Obama, Politifact, US Congress
29 December 2009 • 07:09 0
The New Ruffian
I am suddenly elated by the knowledge that newruffian dot com — a domain I registered a long time ago and that I had assumed was expired — is, in fact, still registered to the accounts I created for it. And so now, after putting up way too damn many posts this week about the title of this wretched waste of digital space, and virtually none of any significance … I finally state with confidence that the selection of this blog’s title is now definitively closed.
SO, what’s The New Ruffian? Well, that depends on the outcome of some inquiries I currently make. More to follow…
• 02:36 0
New Blog Title (again)
SO, after having changed this blog’s title several times of recent, I have decided to go my original intention to use the title as a geographic marker for where I’m currently based. Right now I’m on Capitol Hill and so the blog’s title is ON CAPITOL HILL. In three years, I hope to be permanently returned to London. At that time I may change the blog’s title to LONDONTOWN, for example. In South Africa later this year, the blog’s title will be WORLD CUP 2010.
I’m told changing the site’s title may diminish it’s SEO. To this I say, no worries. At this point I’m more concerned with how the thing looks and what it says than with whether or not it generates a organic search traffic.
Filed under: other , SEO, South Africa, World Cup
28 December 2009 • 15:05 0
Does Froomkin Decide These Things?
“I think that the future success of our business depends on journalists enthusiastically pursuing accountability and calling it like they see it. That’s what I tried to do every day. Now I guess I’ll have to try to do it someplace else,” said Dan Froomkin when the Washington Post canned his ass, and he was right. He is now Washington Bureau Chief for Ms. Huffington’s Post, and the contact for the reporting/editorial internship I covet. Is it too much too assume the decision is his? I don’t know…
But I do know one thing is certain: my American Dream is on the line and I am where I need to be. It is comforting to know that Froomkin was “very disappointed” with WaPo’s decision to terminate their relationship with him. Now I know that he and I at least this much in common. And here at the finish line of a remarkably foul Year of the Ox, I do solemnly wonder if I will find a homeboy in Dan Froomkin.
Filed under: questions , Dan Froomkin, internship, The Huffington Post
• 13:40 0
Resolutions for 2010
- quit smoking
- intern editorially
- out-lobby the student loan industry
Filed under: other , New Year's Resolution, student loan industry