Skip to content

Capitol Latino

Politics, Culture, Reporters, Thieves

Last night’s shift again got me wondering whether or not accurate reportage of an event can irresponsibly challenge a sincere freedom of speech.  Two hours before today’s shift, a 1919 Supreme Court decision by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes reveals that it can:

“the character of every act depends upon the circumstances in which it is done … The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic. It does not even protect a man from an injunction against uttering words that may have all the effect of force … The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent. It is a question of proximity and degree.”

Is a decision better made when the question of proximity and degree quantified? Qualified? etc.

zut.

Advertisements

Tags: , , , ,

%d bloggers like this: